Most popular programming languages 1965-2019 (visualised)

Ola Fosheim Grøstad ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 06:55:07 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 10 October 2019 at 19:17:03 UTC, kinke wrote:
> Presumably the effect of a few opinionated decision makers in a 
> way-too-big corporation with a shameless preference for closed 
> ecosystems. Rightfully dropping into oblivion again by the 
> looks of it [the language, not the corporation ;)].

Not really oblivion.  You  still need Objective-C++ to interface 
gracefully with Swift, but yes, it is more of an interfacing tool 
than a productivity tool.

Anyway, NeXT wasn't a big corporation, but you are right that 
Jobs was opinionated. That said the dynamic aspects of 
Objective-C are suitable for GUI-development. And the big 
advertising point for NeXT was the OO GUI + hardware, so it made 
some sense as there were few available alternatives (Smalltalk 
perhaps).

It was kind of similar to Dart being plugged by Google for 
frontend development, not Go.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list