On Forum Moderation
nise at nise.com
Sat Oct 19 15:28:30 UTC 2019
On Saturday, 19 October 2019 at 12:59:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> From the time I first visited the D newsgroups in 2003 until
> now, it has always been an open forum. Heated discussions have
> always popped up from time to time, but rarely has there been
> the need to ban anyone. Since I joined the moderation team,
> I've been following the loose policy that Walter has always
> espoused, which is something along the lines of "maintain
> professional decorum".
> Granted, certain posts can really stretch the boundaries of
> "professional decorum", but I think that's perfectly fine.
> We're all adults here and should be able to handle verbal barbs
> now and again. Where the moderators draw the line is when the
> verbal jousting turns nasty. We have deleted posts in such
> cases, but again, that's quite rare.
> In my own opinion, what we should not start doing is banning
> people simply for expressing displeasure with the language or
> disagreement with its leadership. Yes, I understand that there
> are a handful of people who seem to do nothing but spread
> negativity and be contrarian. I disagree with almost everything
> those guys post. But that *is not* a bannable offense, nor
> should it be.
> I also don't want to be deleting negative posts just because
> they're negative. Then we get into the business of deleting
> replies that quote them, and maybe even losing some actual
> useful signal in all the noise.
> If such posts bother you, then simply ignore them. Don't reply.
> Even better, don't read any posts by that person at all. D is
> not a religion and there's no need to get upset or take it
> personally when someone comes here and says negative things
> about it. Just keep on doing what you do and forget about it.
> We as a community are not going to suffer from negative forum
> posts unless we allow ourselves to suffer. And no, it's not
> going to hurt us in the world at large. We've suffered worse on
> If you do feel the need to reply to specific criticisms, make
> sure you are in a proper state of mind before putting fingers
> to keyboard so that you can keep it focused on the criticisms
> and not take it personal.
> That said, it would be nice to have a means to lock a thread
> that has become unproductive (I would have locked the feedback
> thread by now). But we don't have that and we aren't going to
> as long as we are backed by a newsgroup.
The best forums on the net seems to moderate the topic not the
conduct so much unless it is outright illegal. However, in order
to keep thread topics on topic I think there must be moderation
of the topic so that the threads don't derail. I think that the D
forum should try a similar approach. Moderators should also have
the "break out thread" option, creating a new thread for someone
who went OT but still has a interesting post.
If someone want to express the general hate for D for some
reason, then they must create a thread for this and not infest an
existing thread about some other technical issue. Some people
have opinions about leadership and which direction D should take,
they should be allowed to express their opinion but in a thread
dedicated for that topic in particular.
I don't want a "sterile" forum, I can take a punch. People who
can objectively argument in the subject are the winners and the
ones who behave badly just degrade themselves anyway.
More information about the Digitalmars-d