On Forum Moderation
no at spam.net
Tue Oct 22 19:44:22 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 22 October 2019 at 19:11:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2019 2:45 PM, welkam wrote:
>> On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 07:16:16 UTC, Walter Bright
>>> Mike's advice is still good. Don't reply to people who push
>>> your buttons.
>> And all the C programmer need to pay more attention when
>> writing their code so they would not get buffer overflows.
> Buffer overflows are unintentional. Replies are intentional.
> The analogy isn't apt.
> Nevertheless, I do know that asking people to not reply to
> trolls doesn't work. This is where experience comes in - it
> takes a few years for youthful enthusiasm "this time it will be
> different" to reply to be battered into bitter oblivion by
I'll repeat that ignoring trolls doesn't solve the problem. If
someone says in 40 different threads that they don't use D
because of the D1/D2 split, and nobody responds to say "that's
BS" then thousands of people that don't know D will come across
those posts, assume it's true, and move on to a different
language. Or worse, they'll see one troll talking about D's
compiler bugs and another troll talking about D being a dead
language and another troll talking about something else. Nuke
those posts and the problem is solved.
More information about the Digitalmars-d