DIP 1022---foreach auto ref---Community Review Round 2
aldacron at gmail.com
Wed Oct 23 03:55:22 UTC 2019
On Sunday, 20 October 2019 at 16:47:47 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 October 2019 at 08:32:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I find the Rationale section to be completely confusing as to:
>> 1. what the existing state of the compiler is
>> 2. what the proposed change is
> What do you suggest? Mike said that it's standard procedure to
> put rationale first and description of the change second. How
> can I be more explicit?
Yes, the Rationale section comes before the Description section.
That's not what he's referring to. He's asking that the current
rationale be revised for clarity. We can work on that when this
review round is complete.
More information about the Digitalmars-d