Discussion: Rvalue refs and a Move construtor for D

Suleyman sahmi.soulaimane at gmail.com
Sun Sep 8 02:06:54 UTC 2019

On Sunday, 8 September 2019 at 01:46:11 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I understand where you're coming from, but this opens up an 
> enormous can of worms and widens the scope of the conversation 
> enormously... I think we have about a 15% chance of being 
> successful with an @rvalue ref proposal as is, and I feel like 
> if we try and expand that to a type-constructor and make it 
> applicable to pointers, we fall to around 0.01% change of 
> success.
> I spend too much time and energy here as it is. I would advise 
> against doing something that cuts your chances of success by 
> 1000x, and I couldn't personally make the time to argue in 
> favour :/

I didn't intend to just copy C++ blindly. If we did we wouldn't 
have D we would still be using C++. If it's a complete solution 
it has more chance to make it in D. If it's just a knock off of 
C++ it probably won't.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list