DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 2
alexanderheistermann at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 14:01:27 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 09:06:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> This is the feedback thread for the second round of Community
> Review for DIP 1020, "Named Parameters":
> All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
> occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
> on September 24, or when I make a post declaring it complete.
> At the end of Round 2, if further review is deemed necessary,
> the DIP will be scheduled for another round of Community
> Review. Otherwise, it will be queued for the Final Review and
> Formal Assessment.
> Anyone intending to post feedback in this thread is expected to
> be familiar with the reviewer guidelines:
> *Please stay on topic!*
> Thanks in advance to all who participate.
Issues with the "@named" attribute:
1.This is opt-in rather then opt-out, which may causes users to
beg the library maintainers to update their libraries to support
2. Way too much verbiage for declaring functions with named
3.I still think the code breakage caused by named arguments is
still overblown, I never encounter anyone in the C# who complains
about code breakage regarding named arguments.
Most importantly, there should be a alternative solution section
detailing Walter suggestion regarding named arguments. It be a
total waste to not mention his solution given that it has shown
support from other people.
More information about the Digitalmars-d