DIP 1023--Resolution of Template Alias Formal Parameters in Template Functions--Community Review Round 1

jmh530 john.michael.hall at gmail.com
Wed Sep 11 15:52:18 UTC 2019

On Wednesday, 11 September 2019 at 15:36:04 UTC, Stefanos 
Baziotis wrote:
> [snip]
> While that's probably true, IMO both parties
> (i.e. the DIP author and the reviewer) should act objectively.
> Meaning, a use case of a reviewer should be no different
> than another use case.

On this PR thread [1], Atila said he struggled to see the value 
in it. My objective was to think up an example where he would see 
the value. I don't dispute that Atila both should and would act 
objectively in reviewing the DIP. However, if someone says they 
don't see value in something, it can be helpful to provide 
additional examples that might show the value.

[1] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9778

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list