DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 2

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Sep 12 09:18:55 UTC 2019

On 9/12/2019 12:09 AM, rikki cattermole wrote:
> I currently have three solutions to support in place struct initialization with 
> DIP 1020.
> I would like to know which direction you would like me to go.

Just use the syntax I proposed for named parameters. The feature will be 
disabled if the struct has constructor(s) for it, as now.

Kinda nothing to it.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list