DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 2

12345swordy alexanderheistermann at gmail.com
Thu Sep 12 13:54:11 UTC 2019

On Thursday, 12 September 2019 at 09:17:54 UTC, rikki cattermole 
> On 12/09/2019 4:57 AM, Paul Backus wrote:
> There is no reason to believe that Phobos cannot be updated nor 
> other existing libraries.

The development of Phobos is slow as a snail pace, even when it 
comes to refactoring. Again we are talking about old libraries 
that backwards compatible and that are hardly updated. That will 
certainly will kill the adoption rate.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list