DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 2
johnnymarler at gmail.com
Fri Sep 13 16:02:48 UTC 2019
On Friday, 13 September 2019 at 07:56:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'm going to be blunt, so shields up!
> For DIP 1020 and DIP 1019, I keep trying to nudge things in the
> direction of a better design:
> All to no avail. It pains me a great deal to see all this
> effort and discussion going down the drain on designs that are
> both more complex and inadequate. The authors have exhibited
> little or no interest in either adopting my suggestions or
> explaining why theirs are better.
> Andrei and Atila have tried as well.
> This has gone on long enough. DIP 1019 and 1020 are not going
> to be approved.
> (It is clear that a lot of time was spend on the DIPs, and they
> are well written and presented. The authors should be proud of
> them. It's just that we have a better design.)
Thank you for saying this Walter. This is going to save so many
people so much time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d