DIP 1021--Argument Ownership and Function Calls--Final Review

Sebastiaan Koppe mail at skoppe.eu
Wed Sep 18 19:51:49 UTC 2019

On Wednesday, 18 September 2019 at 11:18:30 UTC, Walter Bright 
> On 9/16/2019 11:23 AM, nkm1 wrote:
>> The problem with this DIP is it a part of some bigger picture 
>> (which includes DIP1000, DIP25 and probably other stuff) and 
>> it seems no one understands what this bigger picture is.
> The bigger picture is:
> https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in-d/
> The smaller picture is that one cannot create a ref counted 
> objected that can safely expose a ref to its payload without 
> this proposal.

I, for one, like this DIP. Mostly because it signals me where 
Walter wants to take D, and I like the direction.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list