Understanding DIP 1000 semantics -- Where's the bug?

Sebastiaan Koppe mail at skoppe.eu
Sun Sep 22 07:01:42 UTC 2019

On Sunday, 22 September 2019 at 02:29:49 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> So, there's an inconsistency.

I don't think there is.

I think that taking a reference of a local variable should result 
in a scope T*.

In that case `&value` in `y ~= getValue1(&value);` should result 
in a scope int*.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list