Understanding DIP 1000 semantics -- Where's the bug?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Sep 26 03:49:49 UTC 2019
On 9/21/2019 7:29 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
> Which is it? Where's the bug? Shouldn't the compiler treat `int* i` and `ref
> i` consistently?
`ref` semantics are set up so a ref cannot escape the function it is passed to,
hence there's no error. Pointers have no such restrictions, and so require an
extra annotation `scope` to acquire the restriction.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list