Nim programming language finally hit 1.0

Chris wendlec at
Fri Sep 27 12:59:27 UTC 2019

On Friday, 27 September 2019 at 12:47:44 UTC, jmh530 wrote:

> I came to D from scripting languages like Matlab, Python, and 
> R. It got to the point where my code was taking 24 hours + to 
> run and I tried to find alternatives that were faster.

You're very wise. I wish more Matlab / Python users switched to 
highly performant languages.

> I tried C++, but didn't like it very much. I prefer D to C++, 
> but I'm still far more productive in Matlab/Python/R because I 
> can depend on other people's libraries to a greater extent.
> However, D has made some good progress on the library front in 
> the past two years. Mir has really come into its own with its 
> own little universe around it (lubeck and numir are fun) and 
> the GSOC project Magpie for Data Frames already looks 
> promising. I would contrast this progress on the library front 
> with the intellectual issues you are describing on the language 
> itself. For me, the biggest downside with D was a lack of 
> libraries. As you mentioned above, modules depending on 
> modules. The network effect is very important for these types 
> of use cases. So I do see progress on this front, even if there 
> is a lot of unhappy feelings about some language issues.

That's good to hear. Would you care to tell us what exactly 
you're using D for? I'd imagine it's for some sort of stats / 
machine learning / AI stuff. Your experience might be valuable 
for others who are trying to get away from Matlab / Python, and, 
as bachmeier suggested, D might attract more "scrpiters". Let 
them know what to expect and what you can do with D + Mir etc.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list