memory safety checks and trust

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Thu Apr 16 03:23:29 UTC 2020


On 15.04.20 08:12, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
> 
> Ironically, I argue for consistency with "safe by default"

You really don't. Allowing memory corruption to be annotated @safe is 
inconsistent with the meaning of @safe.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list