More operators inside `is(...)` expressions
per.nordlow at gmail.com
Sun Aug 23 22:50:37 UTC 2020
On Sunday, 23 August 2020 at 22:45:10 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
> But this is definitely a much more drastic change than just
> allowing != in the existing is-expression. I imagine the
> changes to the compiler would not be simple for this.
I guess Walter wants a distinct syntax for compile-time
expressions. `X is Y` is already used at run-time.
Is this related to context-independent grammars?
More information about the Digitalmars-d