More operators inside `is(...)` expressions
dkorpel at gmail.com
Sun Aug 23 23:02:03 UTC 2020
On Sunday, 23 August 2020 at 22:40:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
> Is there a reason you prefer writing !is(T == U) to is(T != U)?
> Or are you looking to define more things?
I don't prefer the former form, but it's not longer (you have to
write parentheses either way), and 95% of my is-expressions are
testing for a positive match (so no ! needed at all).
More information about the Digitalmars-d