More operators inside `is(...)` expressions
timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Mon Aug 24 21:20:41 UTC 2020
On 24.08.20 19:36, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Really, all the arguments for having '!=' for binary operations vs doing
> !(someExpr == otherExp) apply here.
Some, not all (you are not getting rid of parentheses).
> I also really don't find the "it will complicate the compiler" arguments convincing.
If it does so meaningfully, it's probably an issue with the chosen
More information about the Digitalmars-d