Can D used for BIG-HUGE projects?

[Timon Gehr]

On 19.12.20 23:37, Marlon wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 12:40:40 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
>> On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 12:16:46 UTC, Marlon wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 11:44:16 UTC, 9il wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So taking only the good parts, assembled by people that 'spent their 
>>> time' trying to design a coherent and top-class design is fine. 
>>> Playing in the sandbox no, because you design and code better and 
>>> faster than the others. 'Nothing personal, just time & money' Bleah 
>>> again ...
>>>
>>> 'Code means nothing. People are everything. Code reflects people's 
>>> relationships and EXPERTISE' Clap clap, bleah ... you can try to be a 
>>> little more humble, dude.
>>>
>>> Instead of Ilya the Lone Renger, the language needs more people like 
>>> Andrei, with his attitude towards improving things but under the same 
>>> hat, but we know how ended ...
>>>
>>> Balkanization, all the way down, like turtles: try to build something 
>>> BIG-HUGE as the author asked, mixing together all the different 
>>> pieces. A little of sumtype, a little of MIR, a little of phobos, and 
>>> a little of vibe ... it's like nitro, handle with care!
>>>
>>> Atila, knock knock, there's anybody in there? And everyone is 
>>> wondering why D is not growing fast enough?
>>
>> I am not native speaker but your post sounds rather aggressive and 
>> insulting.
>> Please consider expressing your opinion in a more friendly way.
> 
> So, saying that time and money is what really matter, in an open source 
> project, is not aggressive?

No. Do you think "open source" means "waste time and money"?
How is it "aggressive" to be truthful about not being able to afford 
working for free while that work is being sabotaged by bureaucracy?

> Geez ... well, everyone has its values, I 
> still on the side of who effortlessly put its time in trying to grow the 
> WHOLE ecosystem in an harmonic grow.
> ...

I'd rather have variety and competition than people leaving because they 
do not agree with some central authority's vision.