DIP 1027--String Interpolation--Final Review Discussion Thread

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Feb 4 13:26:36 UTC 2020


On Tuesday, 4 February 2020 at 12:47:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> As I expected, this was rejected, and Walter didn't understand 
> what I was saying, says we shouldn't bake % into the format 
> specification (it doesn't)

Yeah, this change actually lives up the DIP's own rationale while 
making advanced uses doable.

Walter is wrong. We all need to stand united for these 
enhancements and not back down.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list