DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Feb 6 20:07:16 UTC 2020
On 2/6/2020 7:30 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Might be a good point to add UFCS discussion to the DIP.
Your analysis is correct and inevitable and doesn't need discussion in the DIP.
It's another illustration why lowering is a good idea - it takes care of things
like this renderubg further exposition and design work not necessary.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list