DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

[Lim]

On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 21:37:11 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> It could be worked out if one examines the whole 
> expression/statement, but I think we're better off avoiding 
> support for such things.
>
> Note that existing templates don't allow operators when 
> omitting parentheses.
>
> -Steve

Yep, that's what I mean. We should make it impossible or have a 
predictable behavior. Unfortunately, this case was not mentioned 
in DIP 1030.