DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Feedback
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 23:24:51 UTC 2020
On 2/6/20 5:59 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 06:09:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community Review of
>> DIP 1030, "Named Arguments".
>>
>> [...]
>
> How will the compiler handle function lookup if there is an ambiguous
> match, but the ambiguous function is in another module? So in your
> snoopy example, if one of the snoopy overloads was defined in another
> module, is the compiler still supposed to treat that as ambiguous?
I responded in your other thread, but the answer should be no. An
overload set is well defined already, this DIP shouldn't change that.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list