DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

[Fynn Schröder]

On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 06:08:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community 
> Review for DIP 1030, "Named Arguments":

I think this DIP is a solid approach to named arguments for D. 
However, I second Timon's concern from the feedback thread 
regarding point 5
> If there are more NamedArguments than Parameters, the remainder 
> match the trailing ... of variadic parameter lists, and 
> Identifiers are not allowed.
Either leftover named arguments should go into the variadic 
parameters (and it must be able to tell whether a parameter in 
the list was given with an Identifier or not) OR a template could 
decide to catch leftover NamedArguments in another form of 
variadic named parameters (similar to Python's kwargs).