DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

[matheus]

On Friday, 7 February 2020 at 03:33:26 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Well, I'll say again that I don't like the idea of having named 
> arguments in the language, because it makes the parameter names 
> part of the API, resulting in yet more bikeshedding and yet 
> another thing that can't be changed without breaking existing 
> code. Once in a while, named arguments may be useful, but for 
> the most part, they're useful because a function has way too 
> many parameters, in which case, the function should have been 
> designed differently.

+1. I never used this feature in C# for example.

Like you said:

"...named arguments may be useful, but for the most part, they're 
useful because a function has way too many parameters, the 
function should have been designed differently.".

Matheus.