DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

Andrea Fontana nospam at example.com
Tue Feb 11 14:05:08 UTC 2020


On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 09:46:35 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi 
wrote:
> Let's put It simple, and let's boil this down to essential: 
> there's MORE probability of FUTURE breakage with named 
> parameters, and that's a fact.

That's true for every dip we approve, not only for named 
paramaters.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list