DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 14:05:08 UTC, Andrea Fontana 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 09:46:35 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi 
> wrote:
>> Let's put It simple, and let's boil this down to essential: 
>> there's MORE probability of FUTURE breakage with named 
>> parameters, and that's a fact.
>
> That's true for every dip we approve, not only for named 
> paramaters.

No, there could be language improvements introduced with breaking 
changes, like the final-by-default that I endlessly put on the 
table as an example, that turns D into a language that's more 
resilient to breaking changes, on the contrary of named 
parameters.