DIP 1031--Deprecate Brace-Style Struct Initializers--Community Review Round 1 Discussion

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Thursday, 13 February 2020 at 08:46:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 February 2020 at 08:22:19 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi 
> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
> Please note the DIP also says:
>
> "This DIP presumes the acceptance of DIP 1030: Named Arguments."
>
> And in an effort to preempt comments like your, I explicitly 
> left this note in the feedback thread:
>
> "Please note that acceptance of this DIP is dependent upon 
> acceptance of DIP 1030. If that DIP is rejected, this DIP will 
> move into "Postponed" for an extended period to allow time for 
> alternative named argument proposals."
>
> I should have left it here, too :-)
>
> Anyway, 1030 is likely to be accepted, but it isn't a given. 
> Walter has pulled two of his DIPs in the past in response to 
> community feedback, so please don't think any his DIPs is a 
> rubber stamp. However, if it *is* accepted, then it saves time 
> if we have both DIPs going through the review process close 
> together. That's all this is.

Acknowledged,  sorry for that ... I need to remember to take the 
morning coffe before posting ... eheh

Anyway, the DIP is fine, I've always hated brace-style struct 
initializers, let's kill them with fire.