DIP 1028---Make @safe the Default---Community Review Round 1
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Jan 3 10:37:15 UTC 2020
On 1/2/2020 6:42 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
> What about bugs for @safe that require an DIP to fix then? Your dip doesn't
> address this at all.
Because this DIP is about making @safe the default, not changing the behavior of
> Your strategy seems to make it safe by default and not
> worry about any code that may be broken from using unsafe language features that
> can not be simply fix with a pull request. I don't see how this is in any way
> off-topic here. Is your current workaround for this is to abused the @trusted
I don't really understand what the problem is. Making code @safe by default will
not cause code to regress into bugginess. What it will do is necessitate
labeling code with @system that were always @system already.
More information about the Digitalmars-d