nothrow by default
Les De Ridder
les at lesderid.net
Sat Jan 4 21:31:10 UTC 2020
On Saturday, 4 January 2020 at 21:07:03 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> lol we could always use existing keywords like crazy:
> or something similar.
I had this idea too (for my toy language). One potential problem
@safe/@system/@trusted though, but you could just keep @trusted
> I also wouldn't oppose templates simply not being affected by
> scope-level keyword attributes. That might be a winner
> actually.... maybe. If you want it to apply to the template,
> you'd just have to explicitly write it again. They get special
> case because of the inference rule.
This is an interesting idea. How often do you actually want your
templates to be affected by scope-level attributes?
More information about the Digitalmars-d