Vote: deprecate std.xml?

[Dominikus Dittes Scherkl]

On Friday, 17 January 2020 at 10:10:19 UTC, berni44 wrote:

> All in all, from the discussion up to now, there seem to be two 
> feasable ways to proceed:
>
> a) remove std.xml
Yes.

> b) replace std.xml by dxml
Why? dxml is available, why should it be part of phobos?
Several people argued that xml should not be in a standard 
library, and the author doesn't want it to be there. Maybe 
replace std.xml with a hint where to find a better solution, but 
that's it.