Vote: deprecate std.xml?

berni44 dlang at
Fri Jan 24 14:14:57 UTC 2020

On Friday, 17 January 2020 at 21:59:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
>> On Monday, 13 January 2020 at 11:09:15 UTC, rikki cattermole 
>> wrote:
>> > dxml is the closest and the author isn't keen to go down 
>> > that right now.
>> Would be nice to know, why.
> Honestly, the only reason that I would consider putting dxml 
> [...]

While I think, it would be possible to have a version in Phobos 
that explicitly states that it does not support the doctype stuff 
(but all else), I perfectly can understand the other reasons you 
gave. So all in all, putting dxml into Phobos is currently not a 

Thanks for your reply! :-)

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list