On Sunday, 26 January 2020 at 14:14:20 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > On Sunday, 26 January 2020 at 13:01:58 UTC, Guillaume Piolat > wrote: > > > Cuz I just think if we are explicitly specifying a particular > smaller type throughout it indicates a pretty clear intent > already. Would a truncated assign operator be feasible? Something like... byte b := a*b-c;