Can we keep std.xml : encode, decode ?

[WebFreak001]

On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 07:55:25 UTC, bauss wrote:
> On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 14:04:57 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
>> [...]
>
> We should really just have something like std.dom which would 
> contain things like that.

for a future API std.dom might make sense, also to replace the 
current std.xml API, but I would really like to keep std.xml : 
encode, decode! (which std.dom could use then too)