Getting action on your favorite D issues

[Avrina]

On Saturday, 6 June 2020 at 13:31:31 UTC, Meta wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 June 2020 at 03:56:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 06.06.20 05:40, Meta wrote:
>>> 
>>> The linked defect, and the issue you posted, don't really 
>>> make sense to me. They both have UB; reading from an 
>>> uninitialized variable (= void), or writing to one member of 
>>> a union and reading from the other. Invoke Undefined 
>>> Behaviour and you get... Undefined Behaviour.
>>
>> Right. It's in @safe code.
>
> Ah, yes, I missed that. Why the hell is = void allowed in @safe 
> again? I vaguely remember Walter arguing that it should be for 
> some reason.

Ironically, he argued it's for performance.