Getting action on your favorite D issues

[ag0aep6g]

On Saturday, 6 June 2020 at 18:43:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> That is, it would be perfectly consistent to say that void 
> initialization of int in @safe code is fine, because every 
> 4-byte bit pattern represents a valid int, but 
> void-initialization of bool in @safe code is no good, because 
> many 1-byte bit patterns do not represent valid bools.

That would be fine, yes. I just don't expect that Walter will 
resolve the issue that way. If he does, updating the spec will be 
no big deal compared to updating the compiler.