Why do you continue to use D?

[12345swordy]

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 14:08:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 6/9/20 9:54 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 00:55:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:15 AM 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d 
>>> < digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, 8 June 2020 at 06:51:59 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>>> > [...]
>>>>
>>>> To bad that @nogc is useless when it comes to manual memory 
>>>> management when it comes to classes as it doesn't work well 
>>>> at all with the class deconstructor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  What do you mean?
>> 
>> You can't call the destroy function for classes in a @nogc 
>> context. The de-constructor is not virtual, because of this, 
>> it doesn't inherent the attributes.
>
> That's true of classes with most attributes in general.
>
> For example, you can't compare objects for equality in @safe 
> code.
>
> This was the point for the ProtoObject idea.
>
> -Steve

An idea that show no progress for what? Two years? I am losing my 
patience with this already. I can't consider d to be a serious 
language if this bug won't be fix in some reasonable time frame 
in the future.

-Alex