Doesn't GC, @nogc, safe, nothrown, * get in the way of getting things done?

[ikod]

On Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 12:43:00 UTC, aberba wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 11:31:31 UTC, rikki cattermole 
> wrote:
>> On 11/06/2020 11:28 PM, aberba wrote:
>>> In D we have so many programming models and I'm noticing this 
>>> has become a problem in itself.
>>> 
>>> For a example should a new HTTP library become safe, or 
>>> unsafe, gc or no gc? Template or no templates, reference 
>>> counting?? @live??
>>
>>
>> Client or server?
> When building an API for others to consume. HTTP is just an 
> example.
>
>
>>
>> Each has a different answer.

I prefer my code be both @nogc and @safe. In case when library 
depend on user code (like for example hashmap or lists) I let 
language to infer library code properties from user-supplied 
objects/structs.