Standard D, Mir D benchmarks against Numpy (BLAS)

[jmh530]

On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 14:00:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Generally speaking, the D/Mir code of the benchmark is slow by 
> how it has been written.
> I am not arguing you to use  D/Mir. Furthermore, sometimes I am 
> arguing my clients to do not to use it if you can. On the 
> commercial request, I can write the benchmark or an applied 
> algorithm so D/Mir will beat numpy in all the tests including 
> gemm. --Ilya

I saw your subsequent post about not seeing the numbers, but I 
think my broader response is that most people don't need to get 
every single drop of performance. Typical performance for numpy 
versus typical performance for mir is still valuable information 
for people to know.