Is it time for D 3.0?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On 3/27/20 2:33 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Further thoughts on this:

Yeah, I just listed things that have had roadblocks that could be 
alleviated by saying it's a new major language version.

Certainly I would consider Phobos part of the language at the moment. In 
D3, it could be separate if needed.

Note that I don't think we need DRASTIC changes to the language. I don't 
think we need to rename it or change core things. But we could just free 
up some of the roadblocks so we can break some eggs here.

Probably there are some more things that make sense for a breaking 
change. Exceptions might be redone as well. Maybe review keyword 
usage/consistency. DIP1000 features might work better as a type 
constructor. Etc.

-Steve