On 3/27/2020 10:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > Clearly D > remaining at v2 for ever more would, I feel, be a Very Bad Idea™ since > it advertises no changes to the language, i.e. a language with a > stalled evolution. If this happens it still seems like a marketing failure. After all, C++ gets a year appended and yet has large changes.