Is it time for D 3.0?

[Denis Feklushkin]

On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 17:29:57 UTC, Les De Ridder wrote:

>> byte -> octet
>
> You could make an argument for the other ones, but I'm pretty 
> sure
> everyone understands what is meant by 'byte' 99% of the time.

At this decade.

I specifically wrote remark about FPGA. Creating new processors 
becomes easy as creating software for them.

In the future we will have a lot of different processors inside 
of PC case. I can easily imagine special purpose CPU with byte 
sized 6 or 16. So as for me it’s better to get rid of this name, 
since in the very first version of D language it was declared 
that standard types are platform independent (except size_t of 
course).