Is it time for D 3.0?

[NaN]

On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 17:40:45 UTC, Denis Feklushkin 
wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 17:29:57 UTC, Les De Ridder wrote:
>
>>> byte -> octet
>>
>> You could make an argument for the other ones, but I'm pretty 
>> sure
>> everyone understands what is meant by 'byte' 99% of the time.
>
> At this decade.
>
> I specifically wrote remark about FPGA. Creating new processors 
> becomes easy as creating software for them.
>
> In the future we will have a lot of different processors inside 
> of PC case. I can easily imagine special purpose CPU with byte 
> sized 6 or 16. So as for me it’s better to get rid of this 
> name, since in the very first version of D language it was 
> declared that standard types are platform independent (except 
> size_t of course).

Dont design based on imaginings of the future, you will almost 
always get it wrong.