Is it time for D 3.0?

[IGotD-]

On Friday, 27 March 2020 at 15:56:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> There have been a lot of this pattern happening:
>
> 1. The safe by default debate
> 2. pure by default
> 3. nothrow by default
> 4. String interpolation DIP
> 5. auto-decoding
> 6. range.save
> 7. virtual by default
> 8. ProtoObject
>

Let's go back to the original question.

If we going to go to D3, then we need a proper project plan so 
that people know what they are supposed to implement. That means 
that someone needs to decide what to implement. As the D 
community works today with DIPs which will yield a dozen 
different opinions, it will be impossible to even plan D3. It 
will take several years before even implementation will begin. In 
this case the outside opinions must be limited if you going to 
decide anything at all.

I can see in front of me that D3 will be a huge project if we 
also going to clean up the libraries, druntime, proper pay as you 
go and so on.

First question is, do we have the resources for such a project?
Do we have a good management model for such project?
Who will decide what to include in the project?
Who will write down everything that needs to be done?