D mentioned on Rust discussions site

[Chris]

On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 15:18:51 UTC, Tony wrote:
>
> Joakim kept arguing in an increasingly petulant manner that the 
> D conference should be canceled. He appeared to think that he 
> had proven that it should be canceled and would not consider 
> any notion that if enough people want to go to it, it should be 
> held. I would guess he left because he couldn’t get his way.

"petulant", interesting.

> I can see why you are very concerned about forum moderation as 
> you don’t appear to use D and seem to visit the forum to solely 
> to get perverse pleasure from degrading the language and those 
> who work on it.

Well, this shows you the flexible standards that are applied 
here. Your comment is unprofessional, it belittles others and 
makes assumptions about other people's motives. Very well, I'm 
not a snowflake, but in the name of consistency may I ask Mike 
Parker to remove Tony's comment. It fulfills the criteria that 
make a comment eligible for deletion according to Mike Parker's 
and Walter Bright's own definition. Anything else would be 
inconsistent and reek of double standards (and people will notice 
it sooner or later).