@trusted assumptions about @safe code
Stefan Koch
uplink.coder at googlemail.com
Wed May 27 12:52:48 UTC 2020
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 12:48:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> On 5/27/20 2:36 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
>>> [...]
's relying on is actually true:
>> [...]
>
> I think this is not the way to view it. @safe code still should
> do what it's supposed to do. It's not any harder *or any
> easier* to call @safe code.
>
> [...]
{
const i = cast(ssize_t) indexof(x, E);
if (i < 0 || i > x.dim)
{
// no luck.
}
else
{
index is in bounds so use it.
}
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list