@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

Bruce Carneal bcarneal at gmail.com
Thu May 28 16:50:52 UTC 2020


On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 16:35:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 16:27:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 14:56:14 UTC, Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a clear problem with the current DIP process. DIP1028 
>>> has made that clear.
>>
>> I disagree. The process itself is working as intended.
>
> Which is why the process is problematic and needs to be changed.

For most DIPs we have two nominally impartial experts looking out 
for the interests of the community.  In the case of 1028 we only 
had 1, Atila.

This is a problem with the process that can and should be fixed.







More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list