@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

Max Samukha maxsamukha at gmail.com
Thu May 28 17:01:23 UTC 2020


On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 16:48:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 16:35:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>
>>
>> Which is why the process is problematic and needs to be 
>> changed.
>
> Again, I disagree. The *process* is not problematic. The issue 
> people are having right now is with the assessment of DIPs 
> written by the language maintainers. That's separate from the 
> review process itself.

This is demagoguery. Gregory and Adam did not refer specifically 
to the review part of the process. And the process overall 
includes assessment.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list