@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

[jmh530]

On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 19:56:53 UTC, Gregory wrote:
> [snip]

>
> The fact a major part of the reasoning behind DIP1028 (aka 
> greenwashing) wasn't brought up for criticism as part of the 
> debate until after the DIP was already accepted, do you see 
> this as a problem? Yes or no?
>

This is factually incorrect.

The issue extern(C) issue was brought up in the initial Community 
Review by Dennis [1] and Steven [2, 3]. I don't see Walter having 
addressed it in the initial Community Review. There was greater 
discussion in the Feedback thread [4] and Final Review [5] by 
more people. The DIP was also updated to incorporate the feedback 
[6], though the DIP author did not agree with the criticism. It 
has also been subsequently updated as part of the formal 
assessment.

[1] 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/cbuddhlodnmbczrfhqdz@forum.dlang.org
[2] https://forum.dlang.org/post/qv62af$ui4$1@digitalmars.com
[3] https://forum.dlang.org/post/qv66ii$17eu$1@digitalmars.com
[4] 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/wkdpnzarkbtqryighzpx@forum.dlang.org
[5] 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/jelbtgegkwcjhzwzesig@forum.dlang.org
[6] 
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1028.md