@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form
Ethan
gooberman at gmail.com
Thu May 28 20:59:19 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 20:55:23 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> But the DIP text itself did not convince the other language
> maintainer. A phone call did. It did not go through on its own
> merits.
Even with a board of more than two members, I'd expect them to
discuss dissenting opinions before coming to a conclusion.
Discussion isn't a problem here, it's impartiality (and lack
thereof).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list